As a field, computer science occupies a unique scientific space, in that its subject matter can exist in both physical and abstract realms. An artifact such as software is both tangible and not, and must be classified as something in between, or "liminal." The study and production of liminal artifacts allows for creative possibilities that are, and have been, possible only As a field, computer science occupies a unique scientific space, in that its subject matter can exist in both physical and abstract realms. An artifact such as software is both tangible and not, and must be classified as something in between, or "liminal." The study and production of liminal artifacts allows for creative possibilities that are, and have been, possible only in computer science. In It Began with Babbage, computer scientist and writer Subrata Dasgupta examines the distinct history of computer science in terms of its creative innovations, reaching back to Charles Babbage in 1819. Since all artifacts of computer science are conceived with a use in mind, the computer scientist is not concerned with the natural laws that govern disciplines like physics or chemistry; instead, the field is more concerned with the concept of purpose. This requirement lends itself to a type of creative thinking that, as Dasgupta shows us, has exhibited itself throughout the history of computer science. More than any other, computer science is the science of the artificial, and has a unique history to accompany its unique focus. The book traces a path from Babbage's Difference Engine in the early 19th century to the end of the 1960s by when a new academic discipline named "computer science" had come into being. Along the way we meet characters like Babbage and Ada Lovelace, Turing and von Neumann, Shannon and Chomsky, and a host of other people from a variety of backgrounds who collectively created this new science of the artificial. And in the end, we see how and why computer science acquired a nature and history all of its own.
It Began with Babbage: The Genesis of Computer Science
As a field, computer science occupies a unique scientific space, in that its subject matter can exist in both physical and abstract realms. An artifact such as software is both tangible and not, and must be classified as something in between, or "liminal." The study and production of liminal artifacts allows for creative possibilities that are, and have been, possible only As a field, computer science occupies a unique scientific space, in that its subject matter can exist in both physical and abstract realms. An artifact such as software is both tangible and not, and must be classified as something in between, or "liminal." The study and production of liminal artifacts allows for creative possibilities that are, and have been, possible only in computer science. In It Began with Babbage, computer scientist and writer Subrata Dasgupta examines the distinct history of computer science in terms of its creative innovations, reaching back to Charles Babbage in 1819. Since all artifacts of computer science are conceived with a use in mind, the computer scientist is not concerned with the natural laws that govern disciplines like physics or chemistry; instead, the field is more concerned with the concept of purpose. This requirement lends itself to a type of creative thinking that, as Dasgupta shows us, has exhibited itself throughout the history of computer science. More than any other, computer science is the science of the artificial, and has a unique history to accompany its unique focus. The book traces a path from Babbage's Difference Engine in the early 19th century to the end of the 1960s by when a new academic discipline named "computer science" had come into being. Along the way we meet characters like Babbage and Ada Lovelace, Turing and von Neumann, Shannon and Chomsky, and a host of other people from a variety of backgrounds who collectively created this new science of the artificial. And in the end, we see how and why computer science acquired a nature and history all of its own.
Compare
Roger Boyle –
I can't remember how I came by this - I think I saw it reviewed on a list and bought it. It is a dense read and took me a long time. Dasgupta writes a scholarly book that is very well presented, showing just where Computer Science lies within Kuhn's picture of scientific disciplines, and it fits well. It's hard to see many outside CS really enjoying this though: it rehearsed a lot I knew already but in a very thorough framework that told me a lot I didn't know as well. I think he would have done b I can't remember how I came by this - I think I saw it reviewed on a list and bought it. It is a dense read and took me a long time. Dasgupta writes a scholarly book that is very well presented, showing just where Computer Science lies within Kuhn's picture of scientific disciplines, and it fits well. It's hard to see many outside CS really enjoying this though: it rehearsed a lot I knew already but in a very thorough framework that told me a lot I didn't know as well. I think he would have done better to stop his history in '59 and not '69 - the 60s saw a fragmentation [growth] that he acknowledges but does not do justice to. Nothing on Graphics, Databases, Information Retrieval, Networks ... The fragments he does cover are clearly up his street and a little too rarefied for my taste.
Aron –
A history of the nature and evolution of Computer Science as a field.
Jesse –
Angelo Costa –
voulpit –
Scott Weitzenhoffer –
Piet de Roo –
Judyta Kasperkiewicz –
Hugh MASON –
Gregory Guglielmetti –
Paul Weinstein –
Dеnnis –
Nitin Rughoonauth –
Dylan McDiarmid –
Iglen –
Karen –
David Calderwood –
Seyi Ogunyemi –
Valerie –
Maer –
Amalia Zekhat –
John –
Narumon –
to'c –
Tiffany –
Demosthenes Papaeliou –
Leon –
Evan –
Gloria –
Nithya –
David Loureiro –
Jina –
Esteban –
Adam Stein –
Omar Frd –
Lisa –
Teo –
Aditya Sakhuja –